theparisreview:

“I used to read an awful lot. Then I found that I had a lot of information and very little knowledge. I couldn’t learn from reading. I was doing something else by reading, just filling up this hopper full of information, but it was undigested information. I used to think the more intelligence you had, the more knowledge you had, but it’s not true. Look at Bill Buckley; he uses his intelligence to further his own prejudices.
“Why one reads is important. If it’s just for escape, that’s all right, it’s like taking junk, it’s meaningless. It’s kind of an insult to yourself. Like modern conversation—it’s used to keep people away from one another, because people don’t feel assaulted by conversation so much as silence. People have to make conversation in order to fill up this void. Void is terrifying to most people. We can’t have a direct confrontation with somebody in silence—because what you’re really having is a full and more meaningful confrontation.”—Marlon Brando, Playboy, 1979
Thoughts?

theparisreview:

“I used to read an awful lot. Then I found that I had a lot of information and very little knowledge. I couldn’t learn from reading. I was doing something else by reading, just filling up this hopper full of information, but it was undigested information. I used to think the more intelligence you had, the more knowledge you had, but it’s not true. Look at Bill Buckley; he uses his intelligence to further his own prejudices.

“Why one reads is important. If it’s just for escape, that’s all right, it’s like taking junk, it’s meaningless. It’s kind of an insult to yourself. Like modern conversation—it’s used to keep people away from one another, because people don’t feel assaulted by conversation so much as silence. People have to make conversation in order to fill up this void. Void is terrifying to most people. We can’t have a direct confrontation with somebody in silence—because what you’re really having is a full and more meaningful confrontation.”—Marlon Brando, Playboy, 1979

Thoughts?

7 months ago 362 notes
  1. lovecraftsgreatestfan reblogged this from theparisreview
  2. amicoolyet reblogged this from whitericebrownheart
  3. whitericebrownheart reblogged this from utnereader
  4. immadragonrawr reblogged this from yeahwriters
  5. books-afterdark reblogged this from reading-as-breathing
  6. tapewormshoelace reblogged this from theparisreview
  7. perry-monster reblogged this from yeahwriters
  8. revolutionaryair reblogged this from utnereader
  9. firefliesanddragons reblogged this from theparisreview
  10. avenuesinthesunset reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    Just because I know a lot doesn’t mean anything at all.
  11. shesagun reblogged this from theparisreview
  12. nothingxmuch reblogged this from utnereader and added:
    Intelligence is about awareness, not knowledge. Otherwise we would be ruled by assumptions of the past. Silence is...
  13. sarawritesbooks reblogged this from theparisreview
  14. netkijev reblogged this from theparisreview
  15. rainbow-blais reblogged this from neimadxt
  16. spaceknit reblogged this from theparisreview and added:
    fuck off
  17. staygoldstaytrue reblogged this from theparisreview
  18. welcometomybookcollection reblogged this from utnereader
  19. mikestav answered: The man was right. T.S. Eliot wrote: “We had wisdom and we traded it for knowledge; we got knowledge and we traded it for information”
  20. mikestav reblogged this from utnereader
  21. hissingbeers reblogged this from theparisreview
  22. rainbody reblogged this from yeahwriters
  23. pegobry reblogged this from theparisreview
  24. metrosideros-polymorpha answered: If Playboy is involved, I’m discrediting it. No amount of literary “knowledge” coming from them could make up for how they objectify women.